Other authors I know can put aside their work once the ink is dry.
Some days I wish I could do the same.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8b1d/b8b1d10f6aa10aac7a812b3069fb2fca1a35b3bb" alt=""
Bottom line. I do worry and can't see myself stopping any time soon.
This week I woke from a nightmare with a new idea on how to improve the opening scene for Book One of the Chronicles.
Does it need improving?
I had some feedback that perhaps it does. So, I worried and came up with an idea.
Each of the other books in the series, so far, have a minstrel introducing the story. Bringing the reader up to speed. One review comment suggested the lack of back-story kept a younger reader from understanding where the action began.. so perhaps a minstrel opening the first book could help there?
The back story is sprinkled through the first few chapters, but if the younger reader didn't get that far, I have a problem. So, for one reader I lie awake at night wondering how to improve things.
Here is what I have come up with.. anyone who has read EXILED: Autumn's Peril, it would be great to know if you think this start helps...
LATEST VERSION of opening scene from EXILED: Autumn's Peril
7 comments:
I am just the same, Rosalie. Every day after work I read what I managed to write the previous evening and I change and edit and delete and tweak! And I know perfectly well that I will start the process all over again in a few days or weeks' time. Even when I did the galley editing of my first novel 'Angel Heart', I just couldn't seem to stop changing and altering words or sentences. Finally I told myself it had to stop...
I like the original version better. It takes the reader straight into the action. Personally, I don't like someone telling me what I should be experiencing for myself.
Perfection is impossible--so is pleasing everyone.
I like getting right into the action as well, especially for a first book in a series. It makes sense to have the minstrel in subsequent books, but I think the opening of book one doesn't need it.
I struggle with the same drive to perfection. I've gotten a little better with this as I've grown as a writer, but it is still a struggle to get the words on the page and not obsess with how imperfect they are.
Hi Marie, Francene, Katie,
I am glad I am not alone. When painting I never knew when to call a painting complete. Only once it was SOLD and had gone to a good home did I finally stop 'fixing' things. :)
Thanks for your comments and opinions. They help heaps. :)
I think I understand your drive to perfection.
But from a reader point of view I do not like when a book that I loved reading is changed.
The version which has been released first is an unique one with all the flaws and good the good stuff.
When you change the book - even it is for the good - it will be a different book. It does not matter for people who never read the book before. But for me it changes everything.
So I will stay with the copy I received for the first time.
I hope it makes sense what I wrote.
Thanks Edi, It makes sense.
Speaking to other readers here at home, they said the same thing. So, I am realising I must learn when 'enough is enough' and to 'leave well enough alone'.
Thanks for your comment.
It seems so tempting to tweak, especially when it comes to digital stuff, but I feel that once it's out there, then one should stick with it. One's style must change. I see newspaper articles I wrote in my 20s. I cringe, but they worked then. It wouldn't be right if I could go back.
Having said that ... I have a strange scenario. My father wrote and never managed to get published and I've just acquired his manuscripts (four novels and a short story). I'm looking into OCR, and plan to change nothing. Absolutely nothing, although it is tempting!
I shall refrain - unless it's libellous.
Post a Comment